|
|
Post by eastcoastdestoyer on Jul 16, 2004 7:07:06 GMT -5
if the warrior is better is it worth it to save up the extra cash?
|
|
|
|
Post by blaster07 on Jul 16, 2004 9:56:50 GMT -5
kinda, the blaster could be faster but the blaster is small and it a 2 stroke imo the warrior is better
|
|
Adam
Private
This Blaster Will Soon Be Running On 4 Cylinders...
Posts: 279
|
Post by Adam on Jul 16, 2004 10:27:22 GMT -5
kinda, the blaster could be faster but the blaster is small and it a 2 stroke imo the warrior is better yea but if u plan on jumping a warrior its no good there like a big rock... thats why i went with a blaster its alot lighter n its quicker, the warrior may be bigger but if u race a warrior n a blaster the blaster is goona be quicker it may not beat it in the long run but with a few mods it will |
|
|
|
Post by blasterrider2000 on Jul 16, 2004 16:54:14 GMT -5
i think blastes are way better ... warriors are way too heavy in the front
|
|
|
|
Post by blasternut on Jul 16, 2004 19:07:51 GMT -5
Warrior=cast iron bath tub on wheels
|
|
