|
|
Post by quadgeek631 on Jul 6, 2004 11:57:31 GMT -5
i was wondering if it was all that important if i got a rear aftermarket shock. i know i want to get works front shocks, but i don't have very much money. would it be okay to just get fronts? let me know if this is a stupid idea!!! thanks for the help.
|
|
|
|
Post by blaster07 on Jul 6, 2004 15:17:31 GMT -5
yea if u dont have the money get fronts first and then back
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Smart-Parts~ on Jul 6, 2004 18:37:41 GMT -5
if u get frount shocks get aftermarket 300 ex fronts becuase u get more travle and ur lower too ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by quadgeek631 on Jul 6, 2004 18:49:14 GMT -5
i never heard of that one before!! maybe i'll look into it, unless someone tells me y it's not a good idea!! thanks for the idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by quadracer34 on Jul 6, 2004 19:56:31 GMT -5
more travel out of shorter shocks? hmm how in the he!! does that work?
dont do a half azz job, get shocks FOR a blaster.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Smart-Parts~ on Jul 6, 2004 22:34:20 GMT -5
well idont think its called travle but like it wasment far a 375 pound quad and then u puitt it on a 320 pound qaud so ur like saving 50 pounds so and u are lowerd anyways
|
|
|
|
Post by quadracer34 on Jul 7, 2004 16:35:16 GMT -5
well idont think its called travle but like it wasment far a 375 pound quad and then u puitt it on a 320 pound qaud so ur like saving 50 pounds so and u are lowerd anyways that makes no sence at all. |
|
