|
|
Post by MXRACER708 on Feb 21, 2005 19:26:31 GMT -5
hey warriors are ugly and they suck at the races ive been with them we stomp all over them but yeah blasters break downa lot but if a warior blows thats HUGE money
|
|
|
|
Post by JeSse on Feb 21, 2005 19:56:29 GMT -5
hey warriors are ugly and they suck at the races ive been with them we stomp all over them but yeah blasters break downa lot but if a warior blows thats HUGE money ya and there is also people with blasters that say they beat 400ex's which is a bunch of bull. all in all blasters are better if ur racing if its trails the warrior is better |
|
|
|
Post by MXRACER708 on Feb 21, 2005 20:10:02 GMT -5
ya and there is also people with blasters that say they beat 400ex's which is a bunch of bull. all in all blasters are better if ur racing if its trails the warrior is better yeah i know blaster is a blaster u cant make them fast in a drag it depends on the rider if the rider in the rx is bad and the blaster rider is good the blaster will win or vice versa |
|
|
|
Post by E3Eblaster00 on Feb 22, 2005 2:01:36 GMT -5
blaster....all i ride are trails and i love my blaster...i think i really just like 2 strokes haha ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Speedy2222 on Feb 22, 2005 8:19:08 GMT -5
you really should have a 4 stroke for trails... less tire spin= traction
|
|
mort
New Recruit
Posts: 89
|
Post by mort on Feb 22, 2005 17:03:07 GMT -5
for racing mx id definately go with the blaster, but i like it on trails too because i can throw it around better than i can a bigger atv like a 400ex or warrior. trails id go with either.one of my buddies has one and wont buy anything else. hes never had problems with it. warriors are the best selling atv ever for a reason though  |
|
mort
New Recruit
Posts: 89
|
Post by mort on Feb 22, 2005 17:03:55 GMT -5
for racing mx id definately go with the blaster, but i like it on trails too because i can throw it around better than i can a bigger atv like a 400ex or warrior. trails id go with either.one of my buddies has one and wont buy anything else. hes never had problems with it. warriors are the best selling atv ever for a reason though |
|
bradley300
Private
gncc sport class #812
Posts: 152
|
Post by bradley300 on Feb 22, 2005 22:37:58 GMT -5
warriors are not that bad. and if a blaster is better then a warrior then why dont u see more cross country blasters then warriors IMO i have had both and can tell u the warrior is better for the woods. the motor has way more power (but a blaster can be modded to get the same power) two strokes u have to rebuild every year and with a warrior u can go two three years and they are fine. so  i race the sport class at the nationals and have seen numerous blasters in the 3 years i have been racing. in that same time period, i have only seen 5 warriors, 3 of those were at the same race |
|
|
|
Post by kdogg43 on Feb 24, 2005 13:35:33 GMT -5
for racing mx id definately go with the blaster, but i like it on trails too because i can throw it around better than i can a bigger atv like a 400ex or warrior. trails id go with either.one of my buddies has one and wont buy anything else. hes never had problems with it. warriors are the best selling atv ever for a reason though you posted this message twice you idiot, lol, thanks for the easy post |
|
|
|
Post by xBlaster152x on Feb 25, 2005 18:43:00 GMT -5
You don't have to work on a 4 stroke as much as you would a 2 stroke. buddy u need to ajust valve and cam chains all the time i have a thumper i would kno. if u change the oil alot a thmper will outlive ne 2 stroke |
|
