|
Post by darkstar on Feb 19, 2005 21:56:51 GMT -5
A warrior truns like a mack truck
|
|
bradley300
Private
gncc sport class #812
Posts: 152
|
Post by bradley300 on Feb 19, 2005 22:03:56 GMT -5
have you seen how a tank runs? it has two tracks parallel to each other, with zero turn radius capability, they can essentially turn within their length. its an expression smarta$$
|
|
|
Post by BMXer4life on Feb 19, 2005 22:04:24 GMT -5
ok so i shoudl get a blaster fomr what i have been hereing. i am 15 years old and am about 5 foot 10. will i fit on this thing and if so for how long? also if i get a blaster then how good would getting the engine ported and polished do and then adding a 240 cit in it? would thta bring noticeable gains. like would i be able to hang wiht a 400 ex?
one last question. can youput the new blaster plastics on a liek 1998 blaster??
thanks
|
|
bradley300
Private
gncc sport class #812
Posts: 152
|
Post by bradley300 on Feb 19, 2005 22:04:34 GMT -5
A warrior truns like a mack truck thank you, that sound better twostrokerocket?
|
|
|
Post by BlackBlaster on Feb 19, 2005 23:33:22 GMT -5
im sayin blaster all the way...youll be much happier
and yes port&polish+240 kit+pipe,filter=a lot of power
and yeah you can put the new plastics on an older one
|
|
|
Post by Max on Feb 20, 2005 0:31:30 GMT -5
I would get the blaster, you might feel a little bit scrunched on it if you grow to be like 6 feet but im sure it wont be a big deal
|
|
|
Post by darkstar on Feb 20, 2005 10:29:44 GMT -5
If you got a 240kit and a port and polish you would not just hang with a 400ex you would beat a 400ex
|
|
|
Post by BMXer4life on Feb 20, 2005 11:37:51 GMT -5
ok thanks for all the replys i tihnk i am gonna go with a blaster. i ride wiht some utilitys liek artic cat 650 and some others, a few sport quads like a 400 ex a warrior, 250 ex and a banshee once in a while.
what shocks can i get for a blaster that are cheap. i have herd of 250 r shocks in back 400 ex shocks, but which one will bolt righ up if any will. also what are good for the fronts?
|
|
BlasterChick
New Recruit
This kinda looks like my beast!!
Posts: 89
|
Post by BlasterChick on Feb 20, 2005 11:56:43 GMT -5
This is a blaster web site you can't ask that here, you know that they all love there blasters and why would they pick a warrior. But I will tell you something it all depends on which you do more trail riding or MXing. If its the trail riding I would pick the warrior but if its the Mxing I would pick the blaster. I know a person who has a warrior and he loves it to death and then I know a person who has a blaster it breaks down alot. And its ALL up to you!!
|
|
|
Post by BMXer4life on Feb 20, 2005 12:23:35 GMT -5
does a warrior do as bad at mx as every one says? i plan on mxing like jsut messing around on a track and doing some jumping wiht it. which one would win in a drag race?
|
|
|
Post by blaster99 on Feb 20, 2005 21:18:12 GMT -5
dont use a worrior for mx its just............ .not good
|
|
|
Post by blacksheep on Feb 21, 2005 17:13:44 GMT -5
look i have nothing againts a warrior and i really dont care for the blaster. But a blaster would win if your a good rider. warrior would lose against a pw50 on a track and i ride trails and the two stroke will rocket you out of turns compared to the 4 stroke. And its not as much work as everyone is saying. my dads 4 stroke breaks down more than my blaster. AND YOU WILL HONESTLY REGRET GETTING A WARRIOR NO MATTER WHAT. ITS UGLY, SLOW, HEAVY,
|
|
|
Post by blacksheep on Feb 21, 2005 17:15:45 GMT -5
does a warrior do as bad at mx as every one says? i plan on mxing like jsut messing around on a track and doing some jumping wiht it. which one would win in a drag race? oh ya i forgot to add this. Ignore what she said. THEIR IS A REASON WHY PEOPLE HAVE CREATED WEBSITES STRICKTLY FOR THE BLASTER AND NOT THE WARRIOR
|
|
|
Post by JeSse on Feb 21, 2005 17:51:34 GMT -5
warriors are not that bad. and if a blaster is better then a warrior then why dont u see more cross country blasters then warriors IMO i have had both and can tell u the warrior is better for the woods. the motor has way more power (but a blaster can be modded to get the same power) two strokes u have to rebuild every year and with a warrior u can go two three years and they are fine. so
|
|
|
Post by kdogg43 on Feb 21, 2005 18:07:46 GMT -5
got with the blaster, 4 stroke engines last longer, but if your not doing hard ridding and only trail ridding, the blaster will be fine, it's way lighter and it's going to be way easier to work on, and the stock blaster is soo simple compared to a stock warrior i think, i just love blasters and hate warriors too
|
|